Patente de Monsanto sobre soya, cuestionada en Munich
Enviado por ETC Staff el
l 3 de mayo de 2007, el Grupo ETC (organización internacional de la sociedad civil con sede en Canadá, conocida anteriormente como RAFI) junto con “No Patents on Life!” y Greenpeace continuarán una batalla legal de 13 años contra una de las patentes de biotecnología más tristemente célebres. En una audiencia que tendrá lugar en la Oficina Europea de Patentes, en Munich, organizaciones de la sociedad civil argumentarán que la patente de Monsanto (EP No. 301-749) sobre todas las variedades de soya transgénica —sin precedentes por su rango tan amplio— debe revocarse. “Ninguna patente simboliza la falibilidad del sistema de patentes mejor que la de Monsanto que cubre toda una especie, los frijoles de soya diseñados genéticamente”, dijo Hope Shand de el Grupo ETC. “La patente de Monsanto tiene graves fallas técnicas y es inaceptable del punto de vista moral”, afirmó Shand.
Monsanto's Soybean Monopoly Challenged in Munich
Enviado por ETC Staff el
On 3 May 2007 ETC Group (a Canadian-based international civil society organization - formerly known as RAFI) together with "No Patents on Life!" and Greenpeace will continue a 13-year legal battle against one of biotech's most notorious patents. At an appeal hearing at the European Patent Office in Munich, civil society organizations will argue that Monsanto's patent (European Patent No. 301-749) on all genetically engineered soybeans - unprecedented in its broad scope - must be revoked. "No patent symbolizes the brokenness of the patent system better than Monsanto's species-wide patent on genetically engineered soybeans," said Hope Shand of ETC Group. "Monsanto's patent is both technically flawed and morally unacceptable," said Shand.
News Release: Food Sovereignty or Green Revolution 2.0?
Enviado por ETC Staff el
ETC Group released a 16-page review of five new initiatives intended to launch what ETC dubs “Green Revolution 2.0” in Africa. Leading the charge is a plan to construct four Centers of Excellence together with a second initiative called the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation. “The Green Revolution that followed World War II focused on semi-dwarf, high-yielding plant varieties” says Pat Mooney, ETC Group’s Executive Director. “It was a one-size-fits-all, take-it-or-leave-it silver bullet,” Mooney adds, “Africa left it.” In other words, Green Revolution technologies were inappropriate for the needs and resources of African farmers. ETC Group’s communiqué warns that, in Green Revolution 2.0, “big-box” science is being buttressed by a strategy to restructure African agriculture. Although the cornerstone of the new revolution will still be high-tech seeds, the G-8 and private foundations also want continental changes in market structure, intellectual property laws, and seed regulation so that agribusiness suppliers can profitably sell seeds, chemicals, and other inputs to farmers. “Big-box science will be linked to small box suppliers,” Mooney argues, “This time, the silver bullet has a gun.”
Civil Society/Labor Coalition Rejects Fundamentally Flawed Dupont-ED Proposed Nanotechnology Framework
Enviado por ETC Staff el
To All Interested Parties:
We, the undersigned, submit this open letter to the international nanotechnology community at large. We are a coalition of public interest, non-profit and labor organizations that actively work on nanotechnology issues, including workplace safety, consumer health, environmental welfare, and broader societal impacts.
DuPont Chemical Company (DuPont) and Environmental Defense (ED) jointly have proposed a voluntary “risk assessment” framework for nanotechnology. These groups intend to circulate their proposed framework both in the U.S. and abroad for consideration and/or adoption by various relevant oversight organizations, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Jugando con Gaia
Enviado por ETC Staff el
Al tiempo que el Panel Internacional de Naciones Unidas sobre Cambio Climático (IPPC) hará pública su alarma más contundente hasta el momento, el Grupo ETC advierte que algunos países de la OCDE, encabezados por Estados Unidos, empujan por que se hagan solamente “arreglos técnicos” para enfrentar el cambio climático. El más extremo —la “geoingeniería”— se refiere a la manipulación intencional del ambiente a gran escala, para ocasionar cambios ambientales. Sin esperanzas de que funcione el Protocolo de Kioto, sin voluntad política para pedir a la industria y a los electores los necesarios cambios de producción y estilo de vida y sin poder negar las evidencias de que el comercio de emisiones de carbono es una farsa, algunos gobiernos empiezan a argumentar que la reestructuración masiva de la Tierra es la única salida. The Guardian reportó a principios de esta semana que el gobierno de Estados Unidos está cabildeando al IPCC para que promueva soluciones de geoingeniería, como contaminar deliberadamente la estratósfera para desviar la luz del sol y abatir las temperaturas.