Quick Reads

Synthia’s last hurdle?

Synthia – the “Original Syn” artificial microbe – may have jumped a hurdle that Dolly – the cloned sheep – never could

Synthia, the (theoretical) human-made synthetic microbe – still barely a twinkle in J. Craig Venter’s eye – may be in search of a surrogate micro-mom sometime very soon. According to a research report released today in Science magazine, Synthia (the subject of a patent application discovered by ETC Group a few weeks ago -see “Goodbye Dolly -- Hello Synthia!”) may have overcome her last hurdle. The report, authored by Craig Venter and his colleagues at Synthetic Genomics Inc., claims to have inserted a foreign bacterial genome into the cell of another bacterial species. Nobel laureate Hamilton Smith who is one of Venter’s co-authors in the research article told a meeting of synthetic biologists in Zürich on Monday that this represents a significant step en route to building a whole new life form. As the article itself concludes, “…we have discovered a form of bacterial DNA transfer that permits … recipient cells to be platforms for the production of new species using modified natural genomes or manmade genomes…”

¿Soberanía alimentaria o Revolución Verde 2.0?

La bala de plata tiene un arma...

El Grupo ETC publica en español el Communiqué de 16 páginas ¿Revolución Verde 2.0 para África?, describiendo cinco nuevas iniciativas para “mejorar” la agricultura en ese continente.

Los proyectos principales son la construcción de cuatro centros de excelencia agropecuaria y la fuerte inversión de las Fundaciones Bill and Melinda Gates y Rockefeller en una “Alianza para una Revolución Verde en África”, AGRA por sus siglas en inglés.

News Release from the Galapagos National Park re: Planktos

The Galápagos National Park (entity in charge of managing and administering the two protected areas of the Galápagos Archipelago), is concerned with the US Company Planktos and its plans to experiment in waters near the Galápagos Marine Reserve. For this reason the park has been examining data to stop the Planktos experiment, which could affect the fragile ecosystems of the Galápagos Islands, declared a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

¡PATENTE REVOCADA! El monopolio de Monsanto anulado en Munich

Más vale tarde que nunca

Munich. La Oficina Europea de Patentes (EPO) puso un alto a la avaricia corporativa de Monsanto el 3 de mayo 2007, al revocar su patente total sobre los frijoles de soya genéticamente modificados (EP0301749), una patente sin precedentes por su increíblemente enorme alcance. El Grupo ETC, organización de la sociedad civil con sede en Canadá, ganó la batalla legal contra Monsanto después de 13 años, contra una patente de especie sobre los frijoles de soya, cuando la EPO sentenció que la patente no era nueva o suficiente (es decir, el paso inventivo argumentado no era lo suficientemente claro o contundente para que un especialista pudiera reproduciro). La demanda contra la patente estuvo respaldada por Greenpeace y por la red europea No Patents on Life. La Dra. Ricarda Steinbrecher de Econexus, con sede en Reino Unido, se unió al equipo contra la patente como experto científico.

¿Geoingeniería para arruinar los mares de las Islas Galápagos?

Abierto desafío al Panel sobre Cambio Climático de la ONU

Mientras el IPCC (Panel Intergubernamental sobre Cambio Climático) —principal grupo científico de la ONU en el tema— se prepara para criticar el concepto de la geoingeniería, Planktos Inc., una impertinente empresa de geoingeniería, anunció estar lista para descargar varias toneladas de partículas minúsculas en las aguas alrededor de las Islas Galápagos, cubriendo un área más grande que Puerto Rico. La empresa asegura que a partir de ello podrá rediseñar la atmósfera, ganar créditos comerciales de carbono e inclusive obtener el premio de $ 25 millones de dólares por la reducción de gases de invernadero, ofrecido por Richard Branson. Gran cantidad de científicos de primer nivel son escépticos en torno a la geoingeniería y muchos grupos ambientalistas y organizaciones civiles están protestando airadamente por lo que consideran una estupidez.

Geoengineers to Foul Galapagos Seas-Defying Climate Panel Warning

As the UN's top climate science panel, the IPCC, prepares to criticise the idea of geoengineering, one maverick geoengineering company, Planktos Inc, has announced it is about to dump several tonnes of tiny particles into the waters around the Galapagos Islands, covering an area larger than Puerto Rico. Doing so, they claim, will re-engineer the atmosphere, win them commercial carbon credits and perhaps a shot at the $25 million prize for greenhouse gas reduction put up by Richard Branson. Mainstream scientists are sceptical and environmental and social justice groups are crying foul.

REVOKED!! Monsanto Monopoly Nixed in Munich

but little joy in foiling soy ploy at this late date

Munich – The European Patent Office put the brakes on Monsanto’s over-the-top corporate greed by revoking its species-wide patent on all genetically modified soybeans (EP0301749) – a patent unprecedented in its broad scope. ETC Group, an international civil society organization based in Canada, won its 13-year legal challenge against Monsanto’s species-wide soybean patent when an EPO appeal board ruled that the patent was not new or sufficient (i.e., the invention claimed was not sufficiently described for a skilled person to repeat it). The patent challenge was supported by Greenpeace and “No Patents on Life!” Dr. Ricarda Steinbrecher of UK-based EcoNexus also joined the opposition team in Munich as a scientific expert.

Patente de Monsanto sobre soya, cuestionada en Munich

La Oficina Europea de Patentes decidirá el futuro de la patente monopólica sobre frijol de soya el 3 de mayo de 2007

l 3 de mayo de 2007, el Grupo ETC (organización internacional de la sociedad civil con sede en Canadá, conocida anteriormente como RAFI) junto con “No Patents on Life!” y Greenpeace continuarán una batalla legal de 13 años contra una de las patentes de biotecnología más tristemente célebres. En una audiencia que tendrá lugar en la Oficina Europea de Patentes, en Munich, organizaciones de la sociedad civil argumentarán que la patente de Monsanto (EP No. 301-749) sobre todas las variedades de soya transgénica —sin precedentes por su rango tan amplio— debe revocarse. “Ninguna patente simboliza la falibilidad del sistema de patentes mejor que la de Monsanto que cubre toda una especie, los frijoles de soya diseñados genéticamente”, dijo Hope Shand de el Grupo ETC. “La patente de Monsanto tiene graves fallas técnicas y es inaceptable del punto de vista moral”, afirmó Shand.

Monsanto's Soybean Monopoly Challenged in Munich

European Patent Office Will Decide Fate of Species-Wide Soybean Patent on 3 May 2007

On 3 May 2007 ETC Group (a Canadian-based international civil society organization - formerly known as RAFI) together with "No Patents on Life!" and Greenpeace will continue a 13-year legal battle against one of biotech's most notorious patents. At an appeal hearing at the European Patent Office in Munich, civil society organizations will argue that Monsanto's patent (European Patent No. 301-749) on all genetically engineered soybeans - unprecedented in its broad scope - must be revoked. "No patent symbolizes the brokenness of the patent system better than Monsanto's species-wide patent on genetically engineered soybeans," said Hope Shand of ETC Group. "Monsanto's patent is both technically flawed and morally unacceptable," said Shand.

News Release: Food Sovereignty or Green Revolution 2.0?

This time the “silver bullet” has a gun

ETC Group released a 16-page review of five new initiatives intended to launch what ETC dubs “Green Revolution 2.0” in Africa. Leading the charge is a plan to construct four Centers of Excellence together with a second initiative called the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation. “The Green Revolution that followed World War II focused on semi-dwarf, high-yielding plant varieties” says Pat Mooney, ETC Group’s Executive Director. “It was a one-size-fits-all, take-it-or-leave-it silver bullet,” Mooney adds, “Africa left it.” In other words, Green Revolution technologies were inappropriate for the needs and resources of African farmers. ETC Group’s communiqué warns that, in Green Revolution 2.0, “big-box” science is being buttressed by a strategy to restructure African agriculture. Although the cornerstone of the new revolution will still be high-tech seeds, the G-8 and private foundations also want continental changes in market structure, intellectual property laws, and seed regulation so that agribusiness suppliers can profitably sell seeds, chemicals, and other inputs to farmers. “Big-box science will be linked to small box suppliers,” Mooney argues, “This time, the silver bullet has a gun.”

Pages